Report
Document cover

The criminalisation of coercive control

A national study of victim‑survivors’ views on the need for, benefits, risks and impacts of criminalisation
Publisher
Law reform Criminal law Legal services Perceptions of crime Coercive control Victims of family violence Australia Justice 2025
Description

The first in-depth national examination of victim-survivors’ views on the impacts of the criminalisation of coercive control finds widespread support, tempered by caution. 

With several Australian states considering or actively implementing laws to criminalise coercive control, this report aims to centre the voices of victim-survivors in the policy debate. The report presents findings from interviews with 130 victim-survivors of coercive control across Australia. It presents their perspectives on the need for a standalone offence, the potential benefits and risks associated with criminalisation, and guidance for safe and effective implementation.

The survey respondents emphasised that criminalisation alone is insufficient and should be accompanied by broader societal changes, including increased awareness, education, and prevention efforts, as well as training for legal professionals and support services for victim-survivors. 

Key findings

  • The majority of victim-survivors expressed strong support for criminalising coercive control. 
  • Criminalisation is viewed by victim-survivors as a way to recognise the severity of abuse, hold perpetrators accountable and deter future offending.
  • Victim-survivors hoped criminalisation would lead to increased safety, improved police response and greater community awareness of coercive control.
  • Potential risks include misidentification of the primary aggressor, exacerbation of existing inequalities for marginalised communities, and the potential for perpetrators to weaponise the law against victim-survivors.
Publication Details
DOI:
10.52922/crg77673
ISBN:
9781922877673
Access Rights Type:
open
Series:
Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council CRG 24/20–21